As an American citizen, I believe it is my duty to question my government when something seems amiss. The freedom to do so is something that has been of utmost importance throughout the history of the United States and provided for by virtue of the Constitution. The events of 9/11 resulted in the hurried passage of the Patriot Act which undermines our basic human rights and freedoms granted by the Constitution and Bill of Rights that we are told still exist in the United States.

Since the official conflicting and inconclusive reports generated by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA and NIST fail to explain the total collapse of any of the WTC buildings on 9/11 using demonstratable and repeatable scientific methods, and in light of the ever-increasing amount of scientific evidence supporting the hypothesis of controlled demolition of the three tallest World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, not to mention the many anomalies of every other aspect of that tragic day, I have decided to join with and support the efforts of those involved in exposing the truth of the events of 9/11.

I believe a debt is owed to the families of first-responders and victims of 9/11 because of the failure of our goverment to do proper scientific research to determine why the WTC building collapsed killing almost 3,000 people on that day, and many more in the following years due to exposure to asbestos from the dust. Those families who lost their loved ones, and the 14,000 people now suffering and dying from the effects of breathing the dust on 9/11 deserve answers to the questions that have as yet gone unanswered.

The Inadequate Official Reports

The 9/11 commission was given the task of investigating "facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001". Their report does not even mention WTC building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, not hit by an airplane, and the third building to collapse in a textbook perfect controlled demolition style as evidenced by video footage at the World Trade Center on 9/11. This ommission from the 9/11 Commission Report in itself is enough to warrant a new investigation. This report does not fully explain the complete collapse mechanism of any WTC buildings.
The final NIST report contradicts itself regarding several facts concerning the structure of WTC 7 and concludes that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC building 7. The NIST study did not include any tests for evidence of explosives in violation of many standard investigative procedures including NFPA 921 fire investigation standards. The report fails to describe the actual collapse mechanism and does not reveal the nature of the computer models used in their investigation, making any scientific confirmation of their conclusions impossible.

The FEMA report contains the following (direct quotes):

(5.6.1) "Further investigation is required to determine whether the preceding scenarios did or could have actually occurred."

(5.6.2) "The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the facade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion. "

"To confirm proposed failure mechanisms, structural analysis and fire modeling of fuels and anticipated temperatures and durations will need to be performed. Further study of the interaction of the fire and steel, particularly on the lower levels (i.e., 1st-12th floors) should be undertaken to determine specific fuel loads, location, potential for impact from falling debris, etc. Further research is needed into location of storage and file room combustible materials and fuel lines, and the probability of pumps feeding fuel to severed lines."

(5.7) "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time."

The FEMA report further recommends more studies be conducted "before any conclusions are reached", and I couldn't agree more:

(5.8 Recommendations)
"Certain issues should be explored before final conclusions are reached and additional studies of the performance of WTC 7, and related building performance issues should be conducted. These include the following:

  • Additional data should be collected to confirm the extent of the damage to the south face of the building caused by falling debris.
  • Determination of the specific fuel loads, especially at the lower levels, is important to identify possible fuel supplied to sustain the fires for a substantial duration. Areas of interest include storage rooms, file rooms, spaces with high-density combustible materials, and locations of fuel lines. The control and operation of the emergency power system, including generators and storage tanks, needs to be thoroughly understood. Specifically, the ability of the diesel fuel pumps to continue to operate and send fuel to the upper floors after a fuel line is severed should be confirmed.
  • Modeling and analysis of the interaction between the fires and structural members are important. Specifically, the anticipated temperatures and duration of the fires and the effects of the fires on the structure need to be examined, with an emphasis on the behavior of transfer systems and their connections.
  • Suggested mechanisms for a progressive collapse should be studied and confirmed. How the collapse of an unknown number of gravity columns brought down the whole building must be explained.
  • The role of the axial capacity between the beam-column connection and the relatively strong structural diaphragms may have had in the progressive collapse should be explained.
  • The level of fire resistance and the ratio of capacity-to-demand required for structural members and connections deemed to be critical to the performance of the building should be studied. The collapse of some structural members and connections may be more detrimental to the overall performance of the building than other structural members. The adequacy of current design provisions for members whose failure could result in large-scale collapse should also be studied."

The FEMA report then, basically comes to the conclusion that further investigation is needed, and this in turn implies that their investigation is not complete, like they admit in the report. This kind of whitewash is inexcusable, and no further investigation revealing the nature of the total collapse of all three WTC buildings has yet to be performed.

Independent scientific studies in the U.S., France and Denmark have proven conclusively that explosives were used to cause the Twin Towers and WTC building 7 to collapse.

A high-tech, highly energetic material known as "nanothermite" has been discovered in all samples of dust tested from the 9/11 event at the World Trade Center.

Nanothermite can only be produced by a very few high-tech laboratories in the entire world. It cannot be produced by terrorists with box cutters living in caves in Afghanistan.

The nanothermite found in all dust samples collected from Manhattan on 9/11 proves to be more energetic (explosive) than the nanothermite described by Lawrence Livermore labs in that it reacts with more energy and reaction is initiated at a lower temperature, and therefore is even more suited for demolition by shaped charges than previous known versions of this compound. In the case of the WTC buildings' destruction, nanothermite was likely used in conjunction with other types of explosives to achieve the results we witnessed.

A word to all Americans, members of military branches, government officials and employees and political office holders: If you have knowledge of anyone involved in the implementation of the destruction of the Twin Towers, Building 7 and the Pentagon on 9/11, it is an act of treason on your part not come forward with such information.